The lightbulb conspiracy is a documentary
about the conception of Planned Obsolescence and how it shaped manufacturing
and consumerism during the Twentieth Century.
Planned Obsolescence is a decision made by
the manufacturers or designers of a product, purposely design, manufacture and
distribute a product to become obsolete or non-functional, to force a customer
to buy a next generation product. This
is decision is often made even before the next generation of products has been
conceived.
From a business perspective this is
remarkable, at the beginning of the 1920s, a group of businessmen
were struck by the following insight: 'A product that refuses to wear out is a
tragedy of business”. A positive of mass manufacturing in the 1920s was that
many goods became widely available and were very affordable, this is one of the
first cases where people began shopping for fun.
The industrial revolution saw the real rise in planned
obsolescence; this is because of the massive growth in mass manufacturing. “The
whole issue with products being made to last not as ling is part of a whole
pattern that came about in the industrial revolution, when new machines were
producing goods so much more cheaply which was a good thing for consumers could
not keep up with the machines, there was too much production.
The light bulb a symbol of innovation and new ideas
was the first victim of this decision, its lifespan reduced increasing the
amount of light bulbs that consumers had to purchase every year. The title of
the documentary the light bulb conspiracy is ironic it is often used as a
symbol for innovation or a new idea, however in the manufacturing world it has
a very high consumption rate, it embodies the practice of planned obsolescence.
I think that this documentary views us consumers as a society
that has been trained by marketing, business strategies, and the frivolous
nature of consumerism. But I think that this is only relevant to the consumer
market, ie lower price brackets of product lines. Buying goods of higher
quality with less frequency is much more beneficial than buying less expensive
goods more frequently.
Take home Messages:
Planned obsolescence was concieved in the 1920s
Growth can not always be sustained
No comments:
Post a Comment